Skip to main content
6 min read

FBAL ETF: what Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF is, what it holds, and how it works

By Sammy · Updated May 22, 2026 ·
Illustration for FBAL ETF: what Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF is, what it holds, and how it works

Short answer: FBAL is Fidelity’s 60/40 stock-bond one-ticker wrapper. Listed in January 2021, 0.40% MER, 15.1% three-year annualized return through May 2026. Largest fund on the Morningstar Five Star and Gold list of 2020 and 2021 launches at about $11.4 billion AUM. Uses Fidelity’s actively managed underlying funds, not index trackers.

FBAL is the heavyweight in this cohort. The flow story matters: the fund attracted about $11 billion despite charging more than the index-based balanced wrappers (XBAL, VBAL, MBAL). Investors are paying for the Fidelity active overlay.

Not financial advice. Fund details change. Check current disclosures.

What FBAL actually is

TSX-listed, CAD-denominated. Fidelity manages it as a fund-of-funds, but the underlying holdings are Fidelity’s active mutual funds and ETFs, not passive index trackers. That is the structural distinction versus XBAL or MBAL.

FBAL fund facts
AttributeValue
TickerFBAL (Cboe Canada)
InceptionJanuary 21, 2021
Asset mixabout 60/40 stocks/bonds, active underlying funds
MER0.40%
CurrencyCAD
Net assetsabout $11.4B (May 2026)
3-year annualized return15.1% (through May 19, 2026)

What FBAL holds

FBAL asset allocation
Fixed income 36.3%
U.S. equity 30.3%
International equity 15.4%
Canadian equity 14.5%
Other 3.9%
Source: Morningstar Direct, data as of May 19, 2026, via The Globe and Mail.

The 3.9% “other” bucket reflects Fidelity’s flexibility to hold alternative sleeves (commodities, currency overlays, and similar) inside the wrapper. That is a feature index-based wrappers don’t have, and it is part of why the MER is higher.

The fee

Fee drag calculator
How much FBAL's MER costs vs XBAL over time
Extra cost from FBAL
$0
That's what you pay FBAL (0.4%) over 20 years above what XBAL (0.2%) would charge on the same portfolio.
FBAL total fees
$0
XBAL total fees
$0
Peer comparison: XBAL, iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (passive index-based). Assumes constant gross return, annual contributions made at year-end, and MER charged on average annual balance. Real returns vary.
For illustration only. Simplified compounding. Ignores trading costs, tracking error, distribution reinvestment timing, taxes, and the obvious fact that real returns are not constant. MERs and peer fees as of May 2026 and may change. Do not use this number as the basis for a real decision.

FBAL costs roughly twice what XBAL costs. The premium pays for Fidelity’s active overlay and the flexibility to use alternative sleeves.

When the active overlay earns its fee

Tax treatment

How FBAL compares to alternatives

  • FBAL vs XBAL or MBAL. Same 60/40 mix; FBAL costs 20 to 22 bps more for the active overlay. Over a long horizon, that fee gap compounds.
  • FBAL vs GBAL. GBAL is iShares’ 60/40 wrapper with an ESG screen for 0.24%. Cheaper than FBAL, different overlay.
  • FBAL vs FGRO. FGRO is the 85/15 growth sibling at 0.42% MER. FBAL is the 60/40 balanced version, slightly cheaper.

Frequently asked questions

What is FBAL.TO?

Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF. A one-ticker 60/40 wrapper that holds Fidelity’s actively managed underlying funds rather than index trackers.

What is FBAL’s MER?

0.40%. Higher than XBAL (0.20%), MBAL (0.18%), or VBAL (0.24%) because of the active underlying funds.

Why is FBAL so much bigger than its peers on this list?

Fidelity has a strong distribution channel through advisors. Many advisor-sold portfolios use FBAL as a building block, which pushed the fund to about $11.4B in AUM faster than the equivalent retail-DIY wrappers.

Is the active overlay worth the higher MER?

Over the three years through May 2026, FBAL has held its own against XBAL after fees. The longer-term answer depends on whether Fidelity’s active edge persists. Historically, only a minority of active balanced funds beat their passive peers after fees over very long stretches.

Where should I hold FBAL?

Inside a registered account, ideally. The higher distribution turnover from the active underlying funds makes the registered shelter more valuable.

How does FBAL compare to a robo-advisor 60/40?

Robo-advisors typically use cheaper index ETF building blocks (XBAL or similar). They cost more in total because of the robo fee on top. FBAL is closer in spirit to an advisor-managed active portfolio in a single ticker.

The honest verdict

The honest verdict
Good fit for
DIY investors who specifically want Fidelity's active underlying tilts in a one-ticker 60/40 wrapper and are willing to pay roughly twice the index-based equivalent.
Skip if
Cost is your headline criterion (XBAL or MBAL deliver the same structural exposure for half the price), or you want a pure index approach.
Cheaper alternative XBAL · iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio · MER 0.20%

Bottom line

FBAL is the active-managed 60/40 wrapper that won the asset war. The performance has been solid, the cost is real. Whether the active overlay is worth it long term is the open question. If you specifically value Fidelity’s underlying funds, FBAL is a clean way to express that. If you don’t, the index-based alternatives do the structural job for less.

Greenline is a free portfolio tracker for Canadians. Free during Beta. Early Members will be offered better rates than new users when we launch paid plans.